#XPRO 1 VS X100T FULL#
#XPRO 1 VS X100T ISO#

You've received some good advice from a couple of happy Fuji owners, as well as some other advice from Fuji skeptics. (I still have a complete FF system and a complete MFT system. With the introduction of the Fijinon 100-400. Since then, I really haven't cared to ponder what it all means as I've been using Fuji for 99.99% of what I shoot, (including sports/action). Because the meter was consistently high, but not with a consistent measurement of high, (ala, always. All the other cameras and meter were in the same ball park but the Fuji's stood apart.

#XPRO 1 VS X100T FULL#

The Fuji consistently read approximately 1/3 stop to a full stop higher than All the other cameras and light meter (depending on subject and lighting). On a number of subjects, (including a gray card), and lighting conditions. Since when, in recent years, has Nikon used a non-Bayer sensor in their commercially available cameras? I agree that Fuji appears to fudge when calculating ISO, but, as you mentioned the standards are vague.Ī few years ago when the XP1 first came out, I did perform an unscientific, empirical comparison between Canon 1DsMKII, Canon 5D, Olympus E-M5, Minolta IV handheld light meter and a Fuji XP1. Its 95% the same camera as the X-T1, except a bit worse EVF and no weathersealing and some other details, but for half the Solarflare: Personally, if I wanted to get into the Fuji X system right now, I'd go for the X-T10. I think ALL current Fuji cameras can fulfill your demand 'can keep me happy for years', but not if you keep wanting the newest features. The cameras arent the fastest in autofocus, but many people consider them sufficient. It has plenty of good lenses, and in fact Fuji seems to be getting only better with time - the new 35mm f2.0 WR and 16mm f1.4 WR seem to be optically completely awesome. That said, the Fuji X system is a good choice. And the rumor mill is in no way guaranteed to be accurate, either. Obviously we cant tell you more about the X-Pro2 than what the rumor mill tells us. You will never ever find a solution that last you for years if the newest set of features will keep impressing you. not part of the Fuji X system.Īnd yet you are impressed by the newest shtick, the X-Pro2.

You want to spend a LOT of money.Īnd yet you havent informed yourself and dont even know the X100t is a compact camera, i.e. You want a solution that lasts for years.

#XPRO 1 VS X100T ISO#

Mind, since the definition of ISO is kinda vague, its not really cheating as such. How did the base ISO magically change, anyway ? The same sensor that does nicely on Nikon from ISO 100 (base) to ISO 3200 does nicely for Fuji from ISO 200 (base) to ISO 6400. Well, actually Fuji simply 'cheats' on ISO. The Xt1 by the time you get a couple lenses puts you in another cost category and we have to assume the XP2 when newly released will up that another notch. That is not a 'people/models' angle of view there. Can you live without the flexibility of different focal length lenses? You mentioned nature as a subject, but with the 100T that's no Macro, no wildlife, no wide vistas. The 100T is pricey given it's a fixed lens camera but there's nothing else to buy because it's a fixed lens camera.

That's a huge cost discrepancy between those three cameras. Then when you need it you can change lenses.Īnd then there's cost. You can put a 27mm f/2.8 on the XT10 and at least get into the same size category as the 100T. If you considered the XT1 what about the XT10 or XE2, they're both smaller than the XP1 and XT1. Leaks about the XP2 suggest the same size and weight. It's bigger and heavier than they assumed. The XP1 often surprises people when they first handle one. You mentioned street and it's good for that, but it's not versatile - what about nature macro or nature wildlife? You first mentioned a DSLR and then rejected size. The viewfinder makes the XP2 a specialty camera. We're assuming a new sensor for the XP2 and that could make a big difference. It's hard to choose when one item is an unknown. Fuji has been doing a pretty good job keeping the lid on the XP2. We know the XP2 will be modeled on the XP1 and can assume the hybrid viewfinder - again a big difference from the XT1's EVF. The XT1 is a systems camera with a full lineup of interchangeable lenses you can choose from. That's great unless you have a spouse and two kids. You can't change lenses to a different focal length. But the 100T has a fixed moderately wide lens. The 100T is a beautiful camera and basically the same sensor guts as the XT1. You're asking should you get a Harley, or a Lexus or a truck. Normally when someone has it down to a choice of three the choices are competitive (eg. Those three cameras are very different one from the other.

Xpro 1 vs x100t